You define the boundary
Bring the written authorization, target assets, identities, exclusions, rate limits, and the question you want the Pilot to answer.
Independent researchers often have the authorization, the judgment, and the tools — but not enough hours to sweep every parameter, role, and state transition. RedDepth adds supervised systematics without taking the work out of your hands.
A large authorized target creates a practical tradeoff. You can go deep on one path, or spend time repeating systematic variations across endpoints, identities, encodings, and workflow state. The paths that remain untested are often the ones time made invisible.
RedDepth is built for the researcher who wants to keep the hard judgment calls while reducing the repetitive sweep. You set the scope and the limits. You orient the session. You review every draft finding.
Bring the written authorization, target assets, identities, exclusions, rate limits, and the question you want the Pilot to answer.
Specialized agents map and test the allowed surface while you remain the human supervisor for scope, ambiguity, and decisions.
Candidate findings go through independent reproduction, then arrive as evidence-linked drafts for you to edit, submit, or hold.
You remain responsible for the authorization, the rules of engagement, and the current AI-submission policy of the program.
RedDepth is not unattended and it is not a submission button. It is a supervised way to make systematic coverage and independent review part of the research workflow.
The initial offer is a paid, limited-scope engagement against one target you are already authorized to test. The scope is agreed up front. The output is an evidence-linked report with independent validation and a coverage-audit pass.
Pilots start at $1,500 USD; final price depends on the scope, surfaces, identities, rate limits, and assessment conditions.